The Office of Transportation coordinates closely with the Department of Planning and Zoning and the Department of Public Works on a number of transportation planning and construction projects.
Howard County will be making aesthetic and security improvements to the bicycle and pedestrian bridge across US-29 in Columbia. For more information about the project, click here.
The Howard County Office of Transportation initiated this Location and Site Analysis Study for the relocation, expansion, and reconfiguration of the existing Downtown Columbia Transit Center to serve as the central hub for future county and regional transit services. The purpose of this Study was to:
• Identify a preferred site, size and location for the new transit center;
• Estimate the number of bus bays that the transit center would need, including those to accommodate
future BRT service;
• Develop site and transit center concepts to meet future needs;
• Provide estimates of improvement costs.
Downtown Columbia Transit Center
Public transportation plays an important role in our community
The Central Maryland Transit Development Plan serves as a guide for transit services in the Central Maryland region, including Anne Arundel County, Howard County, Northern Prince George’s County, and the City of Laurel. It provides a roadmap for implementing service and organizational improvements, including potential service expansion, during the next five years.
The draft final plan (November 2017) is available on the project website at
The KFH Group and will be reviewed by the Howard County Multimodal Transportation Board, the Howard County Transit and Pedestrian Advisory Group, the Howard County Council, the Anne Arundel County Transportation Commission and the Anne Arundel County Council. See flyer for additional details. A 111 page key sections document for Howard County can be found here. A three page plan highlights document can he found here.
The draft final plan will be reviewed at the following meetings:
For more information about the Transit Development Plan, please visit: http://www.kfhgroup.com/centralmd/transitplan.html
Para obtener más información sobre el Plan de Desarrollo del Tránsito, por favor visite: http://www.kfhgroup.com/centralmd/transitplan.html
대중 교통 개발 계획에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음 사이트를 방문하십시오. http://www.kfhgroup.com/centralmd/transitplan.html
Howard County is undertaking a US 1 Safety Evaluation in response to a significant increase in the number of pedestrian fatalities along US 1 in 2015 and 2016 and in light of increasing residential and mixed-use development in this historically commercial and industrial corridor. For more information, click here.
Recent efforts nationwide to promote pedestrian planning and activity have reinforced the value of a systemic approach to pedestrian improvements. In 2014, the Office initiated an update of the 2007 Pedestrian Master Plan. The new Pedestrian Plan, WalkHoward: Moving Forward, continues efforts to improve walkability in Howard County. This Master Plan will address walking in all of its forms – whether you are trying to get somewhere or just taking a casual stroll. WalkHoward will provide a list and map of locations where pedestrian facility improvements are deemed to be needed.
2007 Pedestrian Master Plan Document
2007 Pedestrian Plan Map of Proposed Projects
2007 Pedestrian Plan List of Proposed Projects by Community
2017 Status of 2007 Pedestrian Master Plan Projects
The Phase II study is an extension of the previous Conceptual and Phase I efforts performed to evaluate a Bus Rapid Transit network for the County, including linkages to other activity centers and transit systems in the Baltimore/Washington Region. The purpose of the Phase II study is to provide additional detail and rigor not part of the previous work, and filter/refine alternatives to a level that can be carried forward to the next stage of right of way design, environmental impact and preliminary engineering. The Phase II effort focuses on a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system within three primary corridors (US 29, Broken Land Parkway, and US 1), and examines specific route alignment and stations, ancillary feeder transit services, landside services such as park and rides and pedestrian accessibility, preliminary operating costs, and land use plans to support high quality transit service within and between them. The aim is to identify and evaluate the corridors and feasible alternatives that demonstrate the potential for attracting riders and receiving funding.
BRT Concept Study-Part 1.pdf
BRT Concept Study-Part 2 US 29 Detail.pdf
BRT Concept Study-Part 3 MD 216 Detail.pdf
BRT Concept Study-Part 4 MD 32 Detail.pdf
BRT Concept Study-Part 5 BLP Detail.pdf
Phase 1-Howard County BRT Report.pdf
Phase 1-Appendix A - Travel Model Development and Validation.pdf
Phase 1-Appendix C - Table and Scans.pdf
Phase 2 Howard County BRT Technical Report
Phase 2- Howard County Model Development
Phase 2-Howard County BRT Service Alignments
Phase 2-Service Planning for BRT
Phase 2-Combined Station Planning for BRT
In addition to BikeHoward, the Office of Transportation, in partnership with Columbia Association, developed a study that examined the feasibility of implementing a bike sharing system program in the county. The results will be integrated into the Bicycle Master Plan. The project was completed in January 2015 and the full results of the plan are on the project website.
Howard County has developed its first Bicycle Master Plan: BikeHoward. The master plan addresses bicycling for both transportation and recreation and looks at both on-road and off-road bicycling facilities. The draft version of the plan is on the project website: BikeHoward.com
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix A Intersection Lanes and Photos.pdf
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix B Traffic Count Data.pdf
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix C Existing Cross Sections.pdf
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix D Final Alt 1 and Alt 2 MD 108 Short Term Improvement Preliminary Engineering Plans.pdf
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix E Clarksville Pike Year 2035 Ultimate Roadway Design Concept.pdf
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix F - Cost Estimate.pdf
Clarksville Pike Multi-Modal Traffic Study-Appendix G - Traffic Analysis Worksheets.pdf
Short Range Transportation Development Plan
This document is an update to the Howard County Short-Range Transportation Development Plan (TDP), which is a short-term (typically a five-year period) plan to guide transit system development. The TDP provides a vision of the future public transportation system.
Howard County’s (County) last TDP was completed in 2003. Since that time, the transit program has undergone significant change. The TDP called for service expansion in several areas, and for the County to develop its own maintenance facility. Initially transit services were expanded, but in FY 2005 funding cuts reduced the amount of service by 21%, leading to a 4.3% drop in ridership. However, overall ridership recovered, and so ridership has increased from 672,178 in FY 2004 to over 818,182 in FY 08. In part this reflects expanded service hours and miles, but it also reflects other service improvements since that time. These include development of services that cross jurisdictional boundaries, providing regional linkages, such as the Silver Route. It also reflects improved marketing efforts, including bi-annual customer surveys of both the fixed-route and paratransit services, marketing and information materials in additional languages (Spanish and Korean), expanded hours of toll-free information lines and expanded customer service staffing to reduce waiting.The County has instituted a policy that all new transit vehicles will be hybrid gas- or diesel- electric to reduce the carbon footprint of the transit system. This policy uses County funding to pay for the incremental costs of the hybrid vehicles. New hybrid vehicles delivered so far include hybrid sedans for the paratransit system (offering improved access for those persons not using wheelchairs), and heavy-duty hybrid transit coaches for the busiest routes. In addition, the County has purchased low-floor busesto provide for easier access and quicker boarding.
The TDP is organized into five sections:
Chapter 1 includes an assessment of current and near-term unserved potential need
Chapter 2 provides an inventory and review of existing services
Chapter 3 documents stakeholder and community input
Chapter 4 develops alternatives to address identified needs and performance concerns
Chapter 5 recommends a plan for improvements (with phased implementation) including capital and operating budget projections
Howard County TDP.pdf
Central Maryland Regional Transit Facility
Through a joint partnership between Anne Arundel County, Howard County, the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA), and the Federal Transit Administration renovated and expanded the transit operations facility at 8801 Corridor Road in Savage, completing the projecting in the summer of 2015. The $10 Million facility on seven acres of land is a 20,000 square feet certified LEED Silver building with dedicated service space and parking for over 100 transit and service vehicles, bus washing space, training and office space. The facility is sized to allow expansion of the regional transit to a larger market.
Patuxent Branch Trail Extension Feasibility Study
In December of 2013, the Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning initiated a study to assess the feasibility of linking Downtown Columbia to the Patuxent Branch Trail by exploring and evaluating both existing and potential on and off road pathways to develop a direct connection. The study was initiated in response to direction contained in Howard County Capital Project T7107 that called for a study to evaluate connections and routes to link Downtown Columbia and the Patuxent Branch Trail in relation to their community and environmental impacts and relationship to the Oakland Mills Bridge capital project.
The report contains five sections and an executive summary, along with the appendices. The full report, along with each section and the appendices is presented below.
Executive Summary-Patuxent Branch Trail Extension Feasibility Study- Final.pdf
REPORT-Patuxent Branch Trail Extension Feasibility Study- Final.pdf
Section 1-Summary of Findings-Patuxent Branch Trail Extension Feasibility Study- Final.pdf
Section 4-Recommendations-Patuxent Branch Trail Extension Feasibility Study- Final.pdf
Las traducciones de las páginas del sitio web del condado de Howard se realizan mediante Google™ Translate. Google™ Translate es un servicio de traducción de idiomas en línea gratuito que permite traducir
textos y páginas web a otros idiomas. Estas traducciones son sólo una aproximación del contenido original del sitio web, por lo que la traducción puede incluir lenguaje incorrecto, engañoso, impreciso u ofensivo.
El condado no garantiza la exactitud o fiabilidad de cualquier información traducida por Google™ Translate. Cuando usted solicite una traducción a través de Google™ Translate, abandonará el sitio web del condado.
El condado no se encuentra afiliado de manera alguna con Google, no respalda el uso de la página de traducción de Google®, y proporciona un enlace a Google™ Translate únicamente para la comodidad de los usuarios
del sitio web del condado. Es posible que haya otros servicios de traducción en línea disponibles para su uso en el sitio web del condado. Cuando utiliza Google™ Translate, lo hace bajo su propia responsabilidad,
y es usted quien asume el riesgo de cualquier inexactitud, error u otros problemas que pueda experimentar con la traducción. El condado de Howard no se hace responsable de los errores, daños u otros problemas que
puedan resultar del uso de Google™ Translate.
Howard County website i holh aa let mi cahmai hna hi Google™ Translate ti mi nih a leh mi an si. Google™ Translate cu online i catial (text) le webpages pawl a lak te in online lila in holh phundang ah a lettu a si.
Cu bantuk holh lehnak nih cun website chung i a umcia bia kha a hrawnghrang lawng in a leh tawn i, cu ruang ah holh a leh tik ah aa palh mi tete, a fiang huaha lo mi, a hmaan lo mi silole ngaih nuam lo biafang aa tel kho mi
a si. Google™ Translate nih holh leh a tuah mi chung bia cu a dik bak silole i hngatchan awk a tlak ko, tiah County nih aamahkhannak a ngei lo. Google™ Translate nih holh ka lehpiak ko seh, na ti (request) ah cun, County
website na chuah taak lai. County hi Google he pehtlaihnak a ngeih lo, Google® translation zong a cohlang lo i, County website a hmang mi hna an tlamtlinnak ding zawnruahnak in Google™ Translate kong hngalh khawhnak link
te zong kan tuah chih ko. Online in catial a let mi dangdang kong zong County website ah a um men lai. Google™ Translate na hman tik ah, nangmah duh te in na hman a si ko i, a hmaan lo mi, aa palh rumro mi silole holh leh
kong i buaibainak tete na ton tik ah nangmah mawh a si kong naa fian cia a herh lai. Google™ Translate na hmang ruang i aa palhnak tete, a tlinlonak tete, silole a dang harnak tete a um sual kong ah Howard County cu zei
mawhphorhnak hmanh a ngei lai lo.
Howard County 웹사이트 페이지 번역은 Google™ Translate가 하고 있습니다. Google™ Translate 는 글과 웹 페이지를 다른 언어로 번역하는 무료 온라인 언어 번역 서비스입니다. 이런 기계 번역은 웹사이트 원래 내용을 대략적으로 전달할 뿐, 틀리거나, 오역하거나, 부정확하거나, 불쾌한 단어를 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. County는 Google™ Translate로 번역된 정보의 정확성이나 신뢰도를 보증하지 않습니다.
Google™ Translate 번역을 요청한 사용자는 County 웹사이트를 떠나게 됩니다. County는 Google과 어떤 제휴 관계도 없으며 Google® 번역 사이트 사용을 권하는 것도 아닙니다. Google™ Translate 링크는 오직 County 웹사이트 사용자 편의를 위해 제공될 뿐입니다. County 웹사이트는 다른 온라인 번역 서비스로 쓸 수도 있습니다. 사용자는 번역의 부정확, 오류, 번역 때문에 겪을 수 있는 어려움을 자기 위험 부담으로 받아 들이고 Google™ Translate를 사용하는 것입니다. Howard County 는 Google™ Translate 사용으로 인한 실수, 피해 또는 다른 문제에 책임을 지지 않습니다.