LPWRP Biosolids Project

BioSolids Dryer Solids Handling Process BioSolids Process Diagram BioSolids

March 15, 2017 Update:

Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant 8th Addition –Purchasing has issued purchase order to contractor, Clark Construction based upon their Phase I Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP1) proposal.  Notice to Proceed provided to Clark February 24, 2017.  Clark has mobilized and begun select demolition.   The design and construction team met with Synagro to plan for temporary processing equipment during construction of Phase II (dryer building) now proposed in same location as existing lime stabilization process.  Design of Phase II is ongoing (<30% complete).  Next design workshop will be March 24, 2017 to get County buy-in of dryer building layout.  The 30% submittal is expected in April. A groundbreaking ceremony is planned for April 25, 2017 at 2pm.  

November 14, 2016 Update:
The project is on schedule.  The Engineer’s 90% Phase1 contract documents were received October 27th.  The Design team is reviewing the 90% submittal.  The CMAR is preparing their 90% Cost Estimate.  The CMAR is bidding for subcontractors.  GMP1 is due December 9th.  Targeting to have contract negotiated and awarded by February 17th.  The dryer system vendor has been given NTP and is preparing for 1st design review meeting December 1st.  Coordinating with Synagro on their operations during construction and transitioning to lime stabilization of digested solids while dryers are being installed.  

The following is taken from the Executive Summary of the Preliminary Engineering Report, November 2014 prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc.:


Howard County is proceeding with a Biosolids Processing Facilities Improvements project (the Project) at the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (LPWRP).  The Project will implement the recommendation from the Countys 2013 Biosolids Master Plan Study to replace the current biosolids stabilization practice, consisting of advanced lime stabilization of undigested primary and waste activated solids, with anaerobic digestion and direct heat drying.  While both stabilization processes produce Class A, exceptional-quality (EQ) biosolids, beneficial use of lime stabilized biosolids is limited to bulk agricultural land application, which is becoming more restricted under Maryland regulations.  Anaerobic digestion and heat drying produces a more versatile biosolids product suitable for a variety of beneficial uses.  The recommended improvements provide the County with reliable, cost-effective, and socially responsible treatment and beneficial use of LPWRP biosolids in a changing and unpredictable regulatory environment, as elucidated in the objectives statement for the Master Plan Study.


The recommended improvements also provide to the County the benefits of biosolids volume reduction and annual operations and maintenance cost savings.  As shown by the comparison in Table ES-1, replacing advanced lime stabilization with anaerobic digestion and heat drying is expected to reduce biosolids volume and truck traffic by over 80 percent and save almost $2 million/year in annual operations and maintenance costs.


Table ES-1  Biosolids Improvements Volume Reduction and Cost Savings




Advanced Lime


Anaerobic Digestion and Heat Drying


Type of Class A, EQ biosolids produced

Limed Dewatered Cake

35% to 40% solids

Dried Granule

90% to 95% solids

Total biosolids volume, wet tons/year



Biosolids hauling, average trucks/day



Biosolids operations and maintenance, $/year

$4.4 million

$2.5 million


The Preliminary Engineering phase of the Project was undertaken to:


·         identify viable beneficial use markets for dried biosolids in Maryland and neighboring states;

·         determine which drum and belt dryer options can reliably produce the type of dried biosolids preferred in each viable beneficial use market;

·         evaluate and select the recommended alternatives for drying, anaerobic digestion, and supporting solids handling process improvements;

·         refine design criteria, equipment configurations, and facility layouts for the recommended solids and biosolids improvements to serve as the basis for final detailed design; and prepare a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost for the Project for the Countys capital improvements program budgeting.



Key decisions that emerged from the Preliminary Engineering evaluations to align selected alternatives and preliminary design configurations with the Countys biosolids management objectives are summarized in Table ES-2.


Table ES-2  Key Preliminary Design  Decisions


Key Decision


Soil blending is the primary target market for LPWRP dried biosolids; agricultural land application is the secondary market

Market survey showed a viable Maryland soil blending market with significant interest in and capacity for dried biosolids, but little interest for dried biosolids in local specialty fertilizer markets

Provide belt dryers for the LPWRP; final selection of the specific dryer model to be made during final design

Belt dryers produce a granular dried biosolids product that is suitable for agricultural uses and preferred by soil blenders over the spherical pellets produced by drum dryers.

Repurpose two anaerobic pretreatment reactors as anaerobic digesters and add a third digester of equal size

Provides operational flexibility; retention times for well- stabilized, low odor solids to drying; and reliable Class B biosolids as a backup to drying.

Minimize encroachment of new facilities on lime stabilization and staging area

Maintain and minimize impacts to lime stabilization, staging and hauling operations during construction.

Co-locate centrifuges and belt dryers

More efficient dewatering and drying operations and avoids pumping/conveying dewatered solids long distances

Provide sidestream centrate treatment

Maintains nutrient removal capacity in mainstream process for future growth

Provide new gravity belt thickeners for waste activated solids (WAS) thickening

More consistent and thicker solids feed to anaerobic digestion improves process performance


Major elements of the recommended improvements for the Project are shown on Figure ES-1 and summarized in Table ES-3.


Table ES-3  Summary  of the Recommended Improvements


Process or Facility

Recommended Improvements




Heat Drying

New Dewatering and Drying Building

Two direct belt dryer systems

Odor control biofilter for dryer exhaust

Dried biosolids storage silos and truck loading station

Backup dewatered solids truck loading station



Relocate three existing centrifuges to new Dewatering and Drying





Anaerobic Digestion

Convert two 1.75 MG anaerobic pretreatment reactors into anaerobic digesters with gas holder membrane covers and pumped mixing

Add third 1.75 MG anaerobic digester with fixed cover and pumped mixing New Digester and Boiler Buildings housing digester pumping, mixing and heating e