August 22nd 2017 Update:
Phase I construction continues on foundation preparation and underground utilities. Contract is 177 days into construction of a total 884 days in the contract or 20% complete by time. It is on track for earned value. Phase II 60% design received July 2017 and under County review. A request for proposals was advertised in July for biosolids management services. Award to responsive and responsible bidder is pending and contract is expected to begin February 1, 2018 which will provide for a temporary Class B lime stabilization process for approximately one year then transition to distribution of anaerobically digested Class B product and ultimately distribution of dried biosolids if the contract is extended to its maximum five-year term.
April 25th 2017 Update:
Howard County Executive Breaks Ground on New Biosolids Facility
Click Video Links below to view the Ground Breaking Ceremony on March 25th below.
Short Version Video
Long Version Video
Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant 8th Addition –Purchasing has issued purchase order to contractor, Clark Construction based upon their Phase I Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP1) proposal. Notice to Proceed provided to Clark February 24, 2017. Clark has mobilized and begun select demolition. The design and construction team met with Synagro to plan for temporary processing equipment during construction of Phase II (dryer building) now proposed in same location as existing lime stabilization process. Design of Phase II is ongoing (<30% complete). Next design workshop will be March 24, 2017 to get County buy-in of dryer building layout. The 30% submittal is expected in April. A groundbreaking ceremony is planned for April 25, 2017 at 2pm.
The following is taken from the Executive Summary of the Preliminary Engineering Report, November 2014 prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc.:
Howard County is proceeding with a Biosolids Processing Facilities Improvements project (the Project) at the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (LPWRP). The Project will implement the recommendation from the County’s 2013 Biosolids Master Plan Study to replace the current biosolids stabilization practice, consisting of advanced lime stabilization of undigested primary and waste activated solids, with anaerobic digestion and direct heat drying. While both stabilization processes produce Class A, exceptional-quality (EQ) biosolids, beneficial use of lime stabilized biosolids is limited to bulk agricultural land application, which is becoming more restricted under Maryland regulations. Anaerobic digestion and heat drying produces a more versatile biosolids product suitable for a variety of beneficial uses. The recommended improvements provide the County with reliable, cost-effective, and socially responsible treatment and beneficial use of LPWRP biosolids in a changing and unpredictable regulatory environment, as elucidated in the objectives statement for the Master Plan Study.
The recommended improvements also provide to the County the benefits of biosolids volume reduction and annual operations and maintenance cost savings. As shown by the comparison in Table ES-1, replacing advanced lime stabilization with anaerobic digestion and heat drying is expected to reduce biosolids volume and truck traffic by over 80 percent and save almost $2 million/year in annual operations and maintenance costs.
Table ES-1 Biosolids Improvements Volume Reduction and Cost Savings
Anaerobic Digestion and Heat Drying
Type of Class A, EQ biosolids produced
Limed Dewatered Cake
35% to 40% solids
90% to 95% solids
Total biosolids volume, wet tons/year
Biosolids hauling, average trucks/day
Biosolids operations and maintenance, $/year
The Preliminary Engineering phase of the Project was undertaken to:
· identify viable beneficial use markets for dried biosolids in Maryland and neighboring states;
· determine which drum and belt dryer options can reliably produce the type of dried biosolids preferred in each viable beneficial use market;
· evaluate and select the recommended alternatives for drying, anaerobic digestion, and supporting solids handling process improvements;
· refine design criteria, equipment configurations, and facility layouts for the recommended solids and biosolids improvements to serve as the basis for final detailed design; and prepare a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost for the Proje